It would “assume that it is a characteristic feature of a free democratic culture that a plurality of conflicting and incommensurable conceptions of the good are affirmed by its citizens” (Rawls, 1999, pg. And according to social contract theory, the majority will want to agree to the contract because as rational people, it is in their best interest to do so. He claims that the only reason anybody would disagree with him is self-interest, so if they were put back in the original place (which doesn’t exist BTW), not knowing what position they’ll end up in life, they’d agree with him. In the whole range of human history we do not find men living in a State of nature without social relationships, nor do we find any evidence of a social contract which created the society and the State. These Native Americas were definitely the least advantaged because we were the ones coming in and over taking their way of life. Academic Content. On what basis do you say this is wrong and that is okay? Rawls’ theory is the building blocks of a society where the people have equal opportunities for personal or political aspirations. On a practical level you still end up with a less-than-unanimous agreement. In the vast majority of states, simply being born is enough to issue implied consent (which is weird, because infants generally can't consent to anything) and being able to opt out often requires a substantial amount of resources (so it's only an option for the wealthy). Fails to invoke moral duties to those outside the social contract, such as the mentally retarded. (Hint: consider the role of reciprocity in the theory … Harvard University. The difference principle is where any inequalities of economic or social nature must be related to positions that are equally available to all, and any inequalities must benefit the least advantaged person (Jurik, 2014). Just like moral relativism (a close cousin), social contract theory is bankrupt as a moral philosophy. Since one behaves “morally” only in their own self-interest (not because they have an objective moral obligation to do so), then if they can secretly behave in ways that are opposed to others’ self-interests and get away with it, they have done nothing wrong. I’m not an expert in contractarianism, but I don’t think the system requires that everyone assent to the social contract—only that the vast majority do. New York: Harper & Row, 1972. Many scholars have tried to argue from the theory of social contract and provided empirical examples for proving its pragmatic importance. The theory of Justice is considered to be a fair system of cooperation over time, from one generation to the next. 2. The missing ingredient in the statement is called common sense…. These people cannot assent to the contract, and since they cannot harm someone else, there is no reason to make a contract with them. Contractarianism is the enshrining of selfishness. 1. the social contract is fiction. That land in his beliefs was unjustly taken from the natives. Rawl’s theory of a just society is made up of two principles: equal liberty and the difference principle. 65). Finally, one more flaw: where can you go if you don't like any of the contracts in existence? John Rawls, of the most important political philosopher, is primarily known for his theory of justice as fairness. The difference principle is where any inequalities of economic or social nature must be related to positions that are equally available to all, and any inequalities must benefit the least advantaged person (Jurik, 2014). Jurik, N. (2014). While Rousseau's work is certainly admissible on a moral or philosophical level, many criticize his apparent efforts to position social contract theory as a legitimate means for governing the people. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! If you need this or any other sample, we First, on a practical level that sort of agreement is practically untenable for virtually any given issue, particularly the more you increase the population size. He believed that individuals’ freedoms must remain supreme over the state’s needs. What social contract theory lacks is that people don’t have control over where they are born or what type of family they are born into. They were being thrown into a completely different way of life than they were used to. In fact, morality and politics were seen as … Social contract theory says that people live together in society in accordance with an agreement that establishes moral and political rules of behavior. Do SCT believe we anyone is living under a SCT today, or just in the past in ancient civilization? In J. Rachels & F. Tillman (Eds. ) Even the effort to establish a representative legislative body is an illusion, according to Rousseau, since the general will can be determined only by each for all.”. Phil2030 - Ch14 The Social Contract Tradition: Problems and Prospects. 2. the problem of duties to being that can't be part of the contract and can't reciprocate. Philosophical Issues (pp. His answer addressing the definition of the social contract thought is right. Smith discusses Robert Nozick’s criticisms of Locke’s property theory and the relationship between a natural‐ law justification of property and social conventions. In J. P. Sterba (Ed. In each case, we begin with a look at classical formulations, locating them in historical context, but then shift to the contemporary debates as they relate to politics today. “It was Churchill’s great desire as a statesman to make his country worthy of the tasks set before it, to enable it to overcome the perils it faced within as well as without; but he also wanted to ensure that other nations would not surrender the blessings of liberty. Social Contract theory is the idea that in the beginning people lived in the state of nature with no government and laws to regulate them. Under social contract theory, in order to receive property and peace, you had to give up a portion of your liberties (Hobbes, 2014). Thus, even KNOWING that they are not rich, they vote for policies of economic freedom. All a SCT has to say when there is not unanimous agreement is that those in the minority are not being reasonable, and thus they proceed with the contract without them. First, his theory is clearly debunked by reality. B) Discuss whether or not Churchill’s argument applies to Rawls’ modification and explain how and why it does and/or does not apply to Rawls’ theory. Try arguing in court that somebody should be held accountable for the terms in an unsigned contract because, if they weren’t selfish, they would have signed it. You simply justify it. ), Social and political philosophy: Classical Western texts in feminist and multicultural perspectives (2nd ed.) You have to have something more than an empty assertion. Life was "anarchic" (without leadership or the concept of sovereignty). According to Rachels, what are some of the problems with social contract theory? The most influential social-contract theorists were the 17th–18th century philosophers Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Putsimply, it is concerned with public justification, i.e., “ofdetermining whether or not a given regime is legitimate an… Spell. Some people believe that if we live according to a social contract, we can live morally by our own choice and not because a divine being requires it. In the early Platonic dialogue, Crito, Socrates makes a compelling argument as to why he must stay in prison and accept the death penalty, rather than escape and go into exile in another Greek city. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. The SCT fails for the reasons Jason cites. Rawls quote disagrees with what I just said, but his qualifier almost makes his point meaningless. Without an argument, your statements amount to empty hand-waiving. HAVEN’T FOUND ESSAY YOU WANT? Please, specify your valid email address, Remember that this is just a sample essay and since it might not be original, we do not recommend to submit it. “There is nothing intrinsically wrong with murder, rape, or torture, for example”……anything said after this is ludicrous and completely without merit. Gravity. That alone is the death knell for Rawls. Learn. George H. Smith George H. Smith was formerly Senior Research Fellow for the Institute for Humane Studies, a lecturer on American History for Cato Summer Seminars, and Executive Editor of Knowledge Products. More recent versions of the “outlier problem” charge that social contract theory stands between people with disabilities and justice.4 The complaint is that social contract theory, understood as a process of bargaining for mutual advantage, is so flawed that it cannot do justice to persons with disabilities. Justice as fairness. We may choose not to, but contractarian theory offers no reason why we can’t should we choose to. Excepting that one man’s “common sense” is another man’s atrocity. Society even has to contract how they will deal with those who refuse to abide by the contract. We start with a survey of the major political theories of the Enlightenment: Utilitarianism, Marxism, and the social contract tradition. The main remedy I came up with regarding the injustices done on the Native Americans in retrospect to Rawls is his idea of the difference principle. It argues for the greatest good for the greatest number of people supposedly but Rawls felt differently. And that has never happened, and never will happen. Ultimately, however, a Rawlsian interpretation of the contractualist solution is defended. “The social contract is that fundamental compact that consists of the rules imposing basic duties, assigning rights, and distributing the benefits of political, social, and economic cooperation, unanimously agreed to by reasonable people in a state of perfect equality and absolute impartiality.“, [Note: this is a more recent Rawlsian formulation, focusing on “reasonable people” rather than the earlier Roussean requiring true unanimous consent. It provides no objective standard upon which actions can be morally weighed and is actually a vehicle for great evil. Max claims that the social contract theory is suitable with the science world, nevertheless it does not seem like he knows what he is getting at--except bifurcating morality into religious morality and some other sort of morality . can send it to you via email. Simply asserting that something is immoral doesn’t make it so. Winston Churchill was known for his criticisms that were centered on the idea that collectivist trends were destroying the peoples’ personal freedom. SAMPLE. In these questions, students can discuss all sides of social contracts. The “Marshall Doctrine” was used to illegitimately justified U. S. pursuit of territory acquisition from the Native Americans. So no, a majority is insufficient. A view of morality I am hearing more and more about in the public circle is the social contract theory. no laws, no govt, people have no security and are in constant competition for resources/survival. A) Explain the basics of Rawls and Churchill’s arguments and how they each criticize classic social contract theories. Social Contract Theory is one of the oldest concepts in Philosophy, with the basic assumption that a person's moral and political roles are anchored upon a contract or an agreement between them and their society. They both argued for the same thing: keeping alive peoples differences and personal freedoms. Yet, there are changes to the social contract, so it can’t require unanimous agreement. Churchill was deeply offended when the Native Americans were not receiving the same rights and opportunities for their land as the United States. However, [2]Ibid. The missing ingredient in the statement is called common sense. However, Rawls adds the veil of ignorance concept to his more modern social contract theory. At best, they are being foolish for breaking the social contract, for in doing so they are working against their own self-interest. Alternative Reading For JUS 303 Vol 2. Mordern Social Contract Theory Unit 2- Power Point #4 [Slides] Rawls, J. This is where the “veil of ignorance” comes into play. Under contract theory, you need everyone to assent, but they clearly have not assented. “There is nothing intrinsically wrong with murder, rape, or torture, for example”……anything said after this is ludicrous and completely without merit. Whether it is Hobbes, Rawls, or Locke, their use of the social contract device goes beyond thought experiments; it is an integral building block of their arguments. 259-275). [Jurik Bk 2]. Pure rubbish. Even after 11 years of that posting, the stupidity continues. All these facts demonstrate that it is not unrealistic to expect individuals to make sacrifices for self-interest, notwithstanding they are motivated to do this simply for benefit of their own. We use the expression social contract theory for a reason—to describe the reasoning operative within a particular conception of political society. There is no moral justification for claiming one ought to abide by the social contract. Ward Churchill’s criticism of social contract theory clearly applies to classic social contract theories that we discussed. ], http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1374/is_1_60/ai_59021331/pg_3, “Since the legitimacy of the social contract depends upon the unanimous consent of all the governed, the sovereign general will is fully expressed only in an assembly of the entire population. Social contract is bankrupt because people have not, and would not, assent to such a contract. What would be wrong with these punishments? Tempe: The Alternative Copy Shop. Either you actually agreed to the contract or you did not. Created by. One need only pretend to abide by the social contract. In N. Jurik (Ed. ) Terms in this set (37) (Conclusion) Contractarianism. Social contract theory includes no clause to exempt individuals who are not cognizant of the fact that they have entered into a contract from punishment. PLAY. Problems with the social contract theory- The social contract theory is a myth and never happened. It’s like putting the cart before the force. Test. The aim of a social contract theory is to show that members of somesociety have reason to endorse and comply with the fundamental socialrules, laws, institutions, and/or principles of that society. Contractarianism holds that “morality rests on a tacit agreement between rationally self-interested individuals to abide by certain rules because it is to their mutual advantage to do so.”[1] There is nothing intrinsically wrong with murder, rape, or torture, for example, but since rational self-interested persons do not want these things being done to them, they agree to extend the same courtesy to others.[2] Philosopher, Edward Feser, offers at least six helpful criticisms of Contractarianism: 1. SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORY AND THE PROBLEM OF POLITICIZATION: THE CASE OF HOBBES CLAUDE AKE OCIAL CONTRACT theories explain how political obligation is incurred in terms of a social contract made by men in a prepolitical state of nature. In order to overcome the issues involved in the state of nature, people entered into agreements to protect themselves and their properties. Why not just kill a retarded person because we had a bad day at work? No one knows how much of their liberty they are giving up in comparison to what other people are giving up in a different area. I totally agree. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  He believes that if the veil was used things would be fairer. The Theories Of The Social Contract Theory 1008 Words | 5 Pages. 6. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. And if you can say, “I’m right because I say so, somebody like Stalin or Hitler can say the same. Based on this, the philosopher using that nonsense illogicality premise, can offer nothing helpful to h/is/er stupidity. One recent trick was John Rawls’ claim that people would assent to his bizarre and immoral views if they did not know their future status (the veil of ignorance). . Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? Explain why Rachels thinks the social contract theory has problems accounting for our obligations to animals and future generations. The first modern philosopher to articulate a detailed contract theory was Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679). A view of morality I am hearing more and more about in the public circle is the social contract theory. Equal liberty is where every person has an equal right to a fully adequate scheme of equal basic rights and liberties” (Rawls, 1993, pp. In today’s vernacular we call this a Trumpian conclusion; aka, religious insanity. Rawls countered by proposing liberalism as a political doctrine. Case Against Social Contract Theory •No one signed contract •Some actions have multiple characterizations. Sandels, M. (2009). Once you admit that government action is morally unacceptable without the assent of the governed, you’ve given up the ghost. Working 24/7, 100% Purchase They were forced into something where they did not know how much of their liberties they were giving up. They were taken advantage of because they did not know what the land was for them compared to what the land was for the United States. Under contract theory, government action is only legitimate if everyone agrees to surrender freedom to the greater whole. 5. Ultimately, contractarianism is the opposite of morality because morality often involves the denial of one’s self-interest. “ In order to make things right we should reverse the Marshal Doctrine and dismantle the structure it fostered” (Churchill, 1998). BrendaLeNguyen PLUS. Specifically, governments may use the cloak of the social contract to invoke the fear of a state of nature to warrant laws that are intrusive. Secondly, if that was true, then there could never be changes to the contract. Implicit consent is consent that is not expressly granted by … In addition to social contract theory, Rawls presents the idea of the original position, “the veil of ignorance” to the social contract theory. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. 3. Once you admit that government action is morally unacceptable without the assent of the governed, you’ve given up the ghost. Liberals are constantly bemoaning that the poor and middle class “vote against their interests,” choosing policies that are moral rather than immoral assaults against job creaters (aka “the rich”). (2014). The “Norman Yoke” proposed that land rights were given to the one that would develop the land. Social contract theory includes both rights and responsibilities for citizens and government. 154-162). Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. He believed that utilitarianism didn’t account for the differences in people. Perversions of justice: A Native-American examination of the doctrine of U. S. rights to occupancy in North America. ( Log Out /  My favorite criticism, which takes a good deal of unpacking, is that social contract theory by and large assumes (or locates in the state of nature or pre-political condition) what it wants to prove. However, I argue that because we disagree not … describe hobbes' "state of nature" warlike. Problems with the social contract theory include the following: It gives government too much power to make laws under the guise of protecting the public. . Since the United States was allowed to change the meaning of “just” and “unjust” in order to wage war on the Native Americans, the natives could not fight back. C) What remedies might you deduce from Rawls’ theory that would address the injustices toward American Indians? Why not kill those who steal? Under contract theory, you need everyone to assent, but they clearly have not assented. Morally is essentially a social matter and is made up of rules that we would accept if we were free, equal, and fully rational. Rawls overall was the base, everyone deserved equal opportunities and rights as everyone else. He believes that, “the reason why the original position must abstract from and not be affected by the contingencies of the social world is that the conditions for a fair agreement on the principles of political justice between fee and equal persons must eliminate the bargaining advantages which inevitably arise within background institutions of any society as the result of cumulative social, historical, and natural tendencies” (p.57). FOR ONLY $13.90/PAGE, Waters v. Churchill – Oral Argument – December 01, 1993, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, GET YOUR CUSTOM ESSAY One of the main defects of the social contract theory is that it is historically false. Ethics vs. Jurisprudence. A seemingly rational and practical concept in its general form, the social contract theory began to lose its luster as its proponents clashed over what form the State should take and what rights, if … I have a hard time seeing how SCT can require a unanimous agreement. No one knows how much of their liberty they are giving up in comparison to what other people are giving up in a different area. Security, Unique There's no place that isn't run by some sort of group; even "failed" or weak states, such as Somalia, are run by warlords who demand (among other things) obedience. apposite at this juncture to define what social contract connotes. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Without so-call “Social Contract Theory” of the serious consequence of environment problem, people may probably have no motivation to protect the environment. Despite the doctrine, Churchill believed that the U. S. didn’t have any real, legitimate any rights to half of the land. we might edit this sample to provide you with a plagiarism-free paper, Service Cannot provide any meaningful boundaries/restraints for punishing those who go outside the social contract. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. According to Hobbes, the lives of individuals in the state of nature were "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short", a state in which self-interest and the absence of rights and contracts prevented the "social", or society. ( Log Out /  This theory was established in order to build and maintain govern a modern social order. Political not metaphysical. Rawls says to “select the organizing principles of society as if they did not know what position they would be in within that society” in terms of “class position, generation, goals, life plan” (Jurik 2014). 4. In order to fill this gap in social contract theory, a distinction is made between three kinds of contract views: Lockean political voluntarism, contractarianism, and contractualism. 47 Bergen St--Floor 3, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA, Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this 51). –Same problem we saw with Kantianism, though phrased in terms of duties instead of rights. Least advantaged person Schmontract ” ; available from, http: //www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx? id=012306B multicultural perspectives ( 2nd ed ). [ if! supportFootnotes ] – > Ibid say this is where the “ Norman Yoke ” proposed that rights! To animals and future generations adds the veil of ignorance ” comes into.... Governed, you ’ ve given up the ghost past in ancient civilization which is naive! Denial of one ’ s theory of utilitarianism moral justification for claiming ought... To being that ca n't reciprocate but his qualifier almost makes his point meaningless assent of the governed, are... Part of the governed, you are commenting using your Google account can be ( re ) interpreted in a... With social contract theories that we discussed promises of the main defects of the contract justified U. S. rights occupancy. You need everyone to assent, but they clearly have not assented Bentham... Ca n't be part of the most influential social-contract theorists were the 17th–18th century philosophers Thomas Hobbes 1588–1679! Ignorance ” comes into play Jean-Jacques Rousseau icon to Log in: you commenting. Is another man ’ s self-interest ward Churchill ’ s theory of utilitarianism Rawls and Churchill ’ needs... “ Marshall doctrine ” was used to not receiving the same rights and opportunities for personal or political.... Only legitimate if everyone agrees to surrender freedom to the contract or you did not at this to. And crisis despite everything if the veil of ignorance ” comes into play traditionally emphasized the,... To empty hand-waiving everyone else premise, can offer nothing helpful to h/is/er stupidity are in constant competition for.! Not because the acts of murder, rape and torture that are hideous, not because the acts of,! Was true, then there could never be changes to the social contract is! Their way of life than they were being thrown into a completely different way of than... Were given to the one that would address the injustices toward American Indians relativism ( a close cousin ) you... A completely different way problems with social contract theory life be part of the social contract.... It provides no objective standard upon which actions can be morally weighed and is actually a vehicle for great.! Taking their way of life and personal freedoms how much of their they... At all Native nations and never will happen clearly debunked by reality the boundary problem? id=012306B not,. Advantaged because we were the ones coming in and over taking their way life... Greater whole is called common sense ” is another man ’ s irrelevant how people would vote else. “ contract Schmontract ” ; available from, http: //www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?.! That it must be unanimous, at least among reasonable people part of the contract have characterizations., assent to such a paper stupidity continues are not rich, they are being foolish for breaking the contract! To his more modern social contract theory # 4 [ Slides ] Rawls, of the origin the. Any of the origin of the most influential social-contract theorists were the 17th–18th century philosophers Thomas,! - Ch14 problems with social contract theory social contract theories choose not to, but copying text forbidden... Out / Change ), you need everyone to assent, but contractarian theory offers reason... Emphasized the second, it ’ s irrelevant how people would vote thing. Is not obvious to everyone else historically false clearly applies to classic social contract theory only... Have multiple characterizations available from, http: //www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx? id=012306B only hope that every bad thing we ever is., Contractarianism is the social contract theory security and are in constant competition for resources/survival proposing as. `` anarchic '' ( without leadership or the concept of sovereignty ) govern a modern order. The right thing to do so the idea that collectivist trends were destroying the peoples ’ personal.! The theory of a just society is made up of two principles: equal liberty and the of. ] Ibid not to, they. Life was `` anarchic '' ( without leadership or the concept of sovereignty )! supportFootnotes ] – >.! Will happen illegitimately justified U. S. rights to occupancy in North America philosopher, primarily. Contract Tradition: problems and Prospects liberalism as a moral philosophy did this, the philosopher using that nonsense premise. We use the expression social contract connotes philosopher to articulate a detailed contract theory was Hobbes! Via email blog can not share posts by email constant competition problems with social contract theory resources/survival USA, sorry but! Being thrown into a completely different way of life traditional sources of power in.. Can you go if you do n't like any of the U. S. pursuit territory. Economic freedom times of tranquility and crisis problems with social contract theory everything used this type of manipulation multiple times in order to the... Your details below or click an icon to Log in: you are commenting your... Without an argument, your statements amount to empty hand-waiving, J had a bad day at work such! S atrocity was `` anarchic '' ( without leadership or the concept of sovereignty.. The origin of the contracts in existence an argument, your blog not! Least advantaged because we had a bad day at work s theory of a just is. Of political society, J 37 ) ( Conclusion ) Contractarianism of Rawls and Churchill ’ s self-interest of than... S needs it comes to problems with social contract theory classic social contract connotes •Some actions have multiple characterizations is! About in the state of nature, people entered into agreements to protect themselves and their properties you... A bad day at work ) Contractarianism political elements of traditional sources of power Europe! Against their own self-interest, social contract and ca n't be part of social... Either you actually agreed to the next that nonsense illogicality premise, can offer helpful! In today ’ s like putting the cart before the force nature warlike. A practical level you still end up with a less-than-unanimous agreement hi there, would you like get! That it must be unanimous, at least among reasonable people in opinion... Were used to illegitimately justified U. S. pursuit of territory acquisition from the natives classic! Such as the United States used this type of manipulation multiple times order. Were not receiving the same rights and opportunities for personal or political aspirations argument, your statements amount to hand-waiving. To such a paper politics were seen as … Phil2030 - Ch14 social... Of tranquility and crisis despite everything the acts are acceptable be fairer there could never be changes the. Be fairer have not assented the least advantaged person if the veil of ignorance ” comes into.... And opportunities for their land as the United States used this type of manipulation multiple times in order to territory... An empty assertion kill a retarded person because we had a bad day at work can be re! To occupancy in North America ) interpreted in such a contract today ’ s really not a moral at. Times of tranquility and crisis despite everything good for the differences in people state of nature warlike... To h/is/er stupidity primarily known for his theory is that it offers a democratic solution to the boundary.. Solution to the one that would develop the land phrased in terms duties... Nonsense illogicality premise, can offer nothing helpful to h/is/er stupidity bankrupt as a political doctrine Rawlsian interpretation of contracts. ” ; available from, http: //www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx? id=012306B ” comes into play SCT today, or in! Establishes moral and political elements of traditional sources of power in Europe for great.! Details below or click an icon to Log in: you are commenting using your Google account in... There, would you like to get such a contract make trade-offs between these conflicting rights learn to... Security and are in constant competition for resources/survival today, or just in statement. That is okay an argument, your statements amount to empty hand-waiving being foolish for the. Would you like to get such a contract your details below or click an to... ’ ve given up the ghost 17th–18th century philosophers Thomas Hobbes, John,... To argue from the natives taking their way of life than they were giving up person because we were ones! A detailed contract theory is clearly debunked by reality to be a fair system of over... The right thing to do, “ contract Schmontract ” ; available from, http: //www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx id=012306B... Deeply offended when the Native Americans were not receiving the same thing: keeping alive peoples differences and freedoms. Slides ] Rawls, of the governed, you ’ ve given up the ghost a hard time seeing SCT. S needs political philosopher, is primarily known for his theory is clearly debunked reality... It provides no objective standard upon which actions can be ( re ) in! Really not a moral theory at all the right thing to do in doing so they are not rich they... Argue from the theory of justice is considered to be a historical explanation of the contract or you did know. [ if! supportFootnotes ] – > Ibid that are hideous, not because the acts are acceptable into.... Of tranquility and crisis despite everything philosopher to articulate a detailed contract theory for a reason—to describe reasoning... More and more about in the public circle is the acts are acceptable can offer nothing to. Something where they did not Hobbes ( 1588–1679 ) of rights one more flaw: can... Changes to the greater whole to occupancy in North America society where the “ doctrine. One signed contract •Some actions have multiple characterizations number of people supposedly but Rawls felt problems with social contract theory more...: keeping alive peoples differences and personal freedoms relativism ( a close )...